| Series |
Adelphi paper ; 371
Adelphi papers ; no. 371. ^A518444
|
| Contents |
Introduction -- Assessing change -- Assumptions, principles and strategy -- Border guarding -- Schengen's security space -- Strategic tools -- Common assumptions and principles -- Control and protection -- Bosnia Herzegovina and Slovenia -- State border service of BiH -- Slovenia -- Macedonia and Albania -- Macedonia -- Albania -- Regional trends and realities -- Shared assumptions -- Subversive spaces. |
| Abstract |
Borders dominate the security agenda in South-east Europe. Political and ethnic discontents focus on disputed borders, while traffickers in migrants and drugs ignore them. The EU argues that the Balkan countries should develop models of border management using its policing standards, but the region is rife with corruption and its border guards are both under-resourced and ineffective. This paper asks how and why border management in South-east Europe is developing as it is, and what this might mean for the future of Europe. Drawing on recent experiences in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Macedonia and Albania, it looks at the ways in which the region's borders are managed, and gauges the development of a consensual European approach to border security. It shows how governments and guards understand the predicament of regional insecurity, and how they respond with strategies that accommodate, evade or subvert unavoidable political pressures. |
| Local note | Joyner-FOR JOYNER LIBRARY HOLDINGS OF THE SERIES, ADELPHI PAPERS, SEARCH BY CALL NUMBER U162 .A3. |
| General note | "First published December 2004 by Oxford University Press for The International Institute for Strategic Studies"--T.p. verso. |
| ISSN | 0567-932X |
