Tools

LEADER 03381nam a2200493 i 4500

001 ssj0002670824;

003 WaSeSS;

005 20260412090153.0;

006 m d ;

007 cr n ;

008 211019s2022 ksu sb 001 0 eng d;

010 a| 2021050480;

020 a| 9780700633395q| (paperback);

020 z| 9780700633401q| (ebook);

035 a| (WaSeSS)ssj0002670824;

042 a| pcc;

043 a| n-us---;

049 a| EREEa| NEHH;

050 00 a| KF5067b| .L87 2022;

082 00 a| 342.73/0622| 23/eng/20220208;

100 1 a| Lurie, Jonathan,d| 1939-=| ^A113461;

245 14 a| The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929h| [electronic resource] /c| Jonathan Lurie.;

260 a| Lawrence, Kansas :b| University Press of Kansas,c| [2022];

300 a| xiv, 171 pages ;c| 22 cm.;

490 0 a| Landmark law cases & American society;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references and index.;

505 0 a| The long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987.;

506 a| Available only to authorized users.;

520 a| "According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"--c| Provided by publisher.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web;

650 0 a| Pocket vetoz| United Statesx| Cases.=| ^A836124;

650 0 a| Indians of North Americax| Legal status, laws, etc.x| Cases.=| ^A26961;

653 a| Okanogan, Methow, San Poelis, Nespelem, Colville, and Lake Indian Tribes v. United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929);

655 0 a| Electronic books.=| ^A491897;

856 40 z| Full text available from Ebook Central - Academic Completeu| https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/eastcarolina/detail.action?docID=7047056;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JOYNER188;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| HSL77;

949 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISh| JMUSIC60;

596 a| 1 3 4;

998 a| 6720770;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6720770-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNESSBKu| 4/14/2026x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6720770-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEBKu| 4/14/2026x| EBOOKz| HERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6720770-3001l| MNETm| JMUSICr| Ys| Yt| MNESSBKu| 4/14/2026x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCE;

The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 / Jonathan Lurie.

Author/creator	Lurie, Jonathan, 1939-
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2022]
Description	xiv, 171 pages ; 22 cm.
Supplemental Content	Full text available from Ebook Central - Academic Complete
Subjects	Pocket veto--United States. --Cases. Indians of North America--Legal status, laws, etc. --Cases.

Series	Landmark law cases & American society
Contents	The long road to the court of claims -- Approaching the gates of the court : the six tribes and Congress until 1927 -- Still waiting at the gates of the court, 1926-1928 -- Reacting to the Pocket Veto, 1927-1928 -- The Supreme Court agrees to read and listen -- The Pocket Veto and the Supreme Court, 1929 and 1938 -- Digging deeper into the Pocket Veto Cases, 1970-1987.
Abstract	"According to the US Constitution, if a bill is not returned to Congress by the president after ten days of receiving it and Congress is adjourned, the bill is effectively vetoed. The so-called "pocket veto" dates at least as far back as the presidency of James Madison, but the constitutionality of its use had not been considered by the Supreme Court until Okanogan, Methow, San Poels...Indians v. the United States was decided in 1929, during the last year of Chief Justice Taft's tenure. Despite responding to a situation in American Indian Law, the Pocket Veto Case is notable for the fact its final decision had nothing whatsoever to do with Indian Law. The Okanogan Tribe is barely mentioned at all in the Court's unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Edward Sanford, which ultimately concluded that the pocket veto is a constitutional exercise of presidential authority"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access restriction	Available only to authorized users.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web
Genre/form	Electronic books.
LCCN	2021050480
ISBN	9780700633395 (paperback)
ISBN	(ebook)

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

The unusual story of the Pocket Veto Case, 1926-1929 / Jonathan Lurie.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability