| Contents |
1. Introduction: The Script and Its Cast -- 2. Civil-Military Decision-makers within Their Theoretical Context -- 3. The Analytical Prism -- 4. The context: From Regime Change, to Peace Building, to Countering Insurgents: Stabilising Afghanistan -- 5. Case Study: The Decision Path to Uruzgan -- 6. Case Study: The Decision Path to Helmand -- 7. Cross-Case Analysis: A Powerful Idea Meets a Window of Opportunity -- 8. Findings Inescapable Entrapments: Informal Action Channels, and Path-Dependent Reasoning -- 9. Avenues for Future Research: Bridging the Theory-Practice Nexus in Strategic Studies. |
| Abstract |
Military involvement in foreign policy decision-making, and its role as a driving force in that process, has long been anathema to both academic and practitioner circles. Without wanting to pursue the quest for principles or ultimate predictions this study looks specifically into the role of the military in foreign policy decision-making. It does so by carefully reconstructing and comparing the sequential series of decisions of a group of British and Dutch senior civil and military decision-makers which have led to the deployment of their militaries into to Afghan provinces of Helmand and Uruzgan. One of the most prominent findings of this analysis is the shaping ability of military initiatives on the series of decisions and the consequent path dependent reasoning during political deliberations on the deployment of military forces: the decision of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands to deploy their troops to southern Afghanistan was based on an emergent case that largely built itself. |
| Bibliography note | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| Access restriction | Available only to authorized users. |
| Technical details | Mode of access: World Wide Web |
| Genre/form | Electronic books. |
| LCCN | 2020437824 |
| ISBN | 9087283644 (paperback) |
| ISBN | 9789087283643 (paperback) |
