Tools

LEADER 04448cam a2200565 i 4500

001 on1397376840;

003 OCoLC;

005 20260527041729.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr unu||||||||;

008 230915s2023 ncu obm 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (OCoLC)1397376840;

090 a| GV711;

049 a| EREE;

100 1 a| Hewitt, Tyler F.,e| author.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Association between coach behaviors and athlete efficacy beliefs :b| self-, other-, collective, and relation-inferred self-efficacy /c| by Tyler F. Hewitt.;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2023.;

300 a| 1 online resource (89 pages);

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text fileb| PDFc| 923.6 KB2| rda;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| M.S.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2023.;

500 a| Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Kinesiology;

500 a| Advisor: Christine Habeeb;

500 a| Advisor: Thomas Raedeke;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed November 5, 2024).;

520 3 a| Confidence (i.e., efficacy) plays a pivotal role in sport, whether it is athletes' confidence in themselves, their coaches, or in their collective group. Studies have shown that athletes' self-efficacy, other-efficacy, and collective efficacy beliefs lead to beneficial outcomes, such as enhanced performance, effort, and persistence. While athletes' perceptions of coach behaviors are associated with their efficacy beliefs, no known research has utilized observed coaching behaviors when exploring this relationship. The purpose of this study was to directly observe coaches and examine how their behaviors (i.e., instruction and feedback, positive and negative evaluation, autonomy support, and motivational climate) predict athletes' self-efficacy, other-efficacy, collective efficacy, and relation-inferred self-efficacy (RISE) beliefs. The sample consisted of three coaches, and 64 athletes from NCAA Division I and III sports. Teams included Division I Women's Soccer (n = 19), Division III Men's Lacrosse (n = 35), and Division III Football (n = 10). Coaches were recorded at a single practice, and their behaviors were coded using the Assessment of Coaching Tone observational coding system (Erickson and Cote, 2015). Athletes completed surveys measuring their self-efficacy, other-efficacy, collective efficacy, and RISE. Initial analyses showed that the coaches differed in behavior use. The football coach directed the most behaviors toward individuals, the soccer coach was the most autonomy supportive, and the lacrosse coach was the most mastery oriented. Furthermore, the football team reported higher self-efficacy than the soccer team, and higher collective efficacy than both the soccer and lacrosse teams. Multiple regression analyses revealed that none of the hypothesized coach behaviors were unique predictors of any forms of athlete efficacy beliefs. The findings contribute to existing literature on efficacy sources and provide directions for future research.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

650 0 a| Coaching (Athletics)x| Psychological aspects.=| ^A1156717;

650 0 a| Coach-athlete relationships.=| ^A367146;

650 0 a| Sportsx| Psychological aspects.=| ^A32236;

650 0 a| Athletesx| Attitudes.=| ^A60330;

650 0 a| Soccer for womenx| Coachingx| Psychological aspects.=| ^A583387;

650 0 a| Footballx| Coachingx| Psychological aspects.=| ^A156275;

650 0 a| Lacrossex| Coachingx| Psychological aspects.=| ^A478194;

653 a| coach behaviors;

653 a| efficacy;

700 1 a| Habeeb, Christine,e| degree supervisor.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

700 1 a| Raedeke, Thomas D.,d| 1963-e| degree supervisor.1| https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjGgp9bcRTkKTFHwbGbMvb=| ^A1169544;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of Kinesiology.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Access via ScholarShipu| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/13129;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 6234533;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6234533-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 9/15/2023x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 6234533-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 9/15/2023x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

Association between coach behaviors and athlete efficacy beliefs : self-, other-, collective, and relation-inferred self-efficacy / by Tyler F. Hewitt.

Author/creator	Hewitt, Tyler F. author.
Other author	Habeeb, Christine, degree supervisor.
Other author	Raedeke, Thomas D., 1963- degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of Kinesiology.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2023.
Description	1 online resource (89 pages)
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Coaching (Athletics)--Psychological aspects. Coach-athlete relationships. Sports--Psychological aspects. Athletes--Attitudes. Soccer for women--Coaching. --Psychological aspects. Football--Coaching. --Psychological aspects. Lacrosse--Coaching. --Psychological aspects.

Summary	Confidence (i.e., efficacy) plays a pivotal role in sport, whether it is athletes' confidence in themselves, their coaches, or in their collective group. Studies have shown that athletes' self-efficacy, other-efficacy, and collective efficacy beliefs lead to beneficial outcomes, such as enhanced performance, effort, and persistence. While athletes' perceptions of coach behaviors are associated with their efficacy beliefs, no known research has utilized observed coaching behaviors when exploring this relationship. The purpose of this study was to directly observe coaches and examine how their behaviors (i.e., instruction and feedback, positive and negative evaluation, autonomy support, and motivational climate) predict athletes' self-efficacy, other-efficacy, collective efficacy, and relation-inferred self-efficacy (RISE) beliefs. The sample consisted of three coaches, and 64 athletes from NCAA Division I and III sports. Teams included Division I Women's Soccer (n = 19), Division III Men's Lacrosse (n = 35), and Division III Football (n = 10). Coaches were recorded at a single practice, and their behaviors were coded using the Assessment of Coaching Tone observational coding system (Erickson and Cote, 2015). Athletes completed surveys measuring their self-efficacy, other-efficacy, collective efficacy, and RISE. Initial analyses showed that the coaches differed in behavior use. The football coach directed the most behaviors toward individuals, the soccer coach was the most autonomy supportive, and the lacrosse coach was the most mastery oriented. Furthermore, the football team reported higher self-efficacy than the soccer team, and higher collective efficacy than both the soccer and lacrosse teams. Multiple regression analyses revealed that none of the hypothesized coach behaviors were unique predictors of any forms of athlete efficacy beliefs. The findings contribute to existing literature on efficacy sources and provide directions for future research.
General note	Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Kinesiology
General note	Advisor: Christine Habeeb
General note	Advisor: Thomas Raedeke
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed November 5, 2024).
Dissertation note	M.S. East Carolina University 2023.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Association between coach behaviors and athlete efficacy beliefs : self-, other-, collective, and relation-inferred self-efficacy / by Tyler F. Hewitt.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability