Tools

LEADER 03257cam a2200589Ii 4500

001 on1268150193;

003 OCoLC;

005 20221026165754.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr unu||||||||;

008 210914s2021 ncu obm 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o1268150193;

035 a| (OCoLC)1268150193;

049 a| EREE;

090 a| BF637.C45;

100 1 a| Li, Ruitong (Cherish),e| author.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Couples communication assessment tools :b| a systematic review /c| by Ruitong (Cherish) Li.;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2021.;

300 a| 1 online resource (237 pages);

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text file;

347 b| PDF;

347 c| 1.950 MB;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| M.S.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2021;

500 a| Presented to the faculty of the Department of Human Development and Family Science;

500 a| Advisor: Alan Taylor;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed September 29, 2022).;

520 3 a| Couple communication plays an important role in the development of intimate relationships. Selecting the right measures based on the researchers' research questions would be a crucial step for purpose of research and practice. The current study systematically evaluated twenty-one commonly utilized measures that focus on assessing couple communication, identified from current literatures stemming from the past 60 years. In addition, 380 unique empirical articles that utilized each individual measure were identified from the PsychInfo database. The theoretical foundation, the strengths and the limitations, and the level of applicability to diverse settings was evaluated for each measure based on the evidence. The best practices in terms of each measure were suggested and discussed based on the patterns found from empirical articles included in current study. Directions for future research were also provided.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

650 0 a| Interpersonal communication.=| ^A5012;

650 0 a| Couplesx| Psychology.=| ^A529286;

650 0 a| Interpersonal relations.=| ^A504;

653 a| systematic review;

653 a| couple communication;

655 7 a| Academic theses.2| fast0| (OCoLC)fst01726453;

655 7 a| Academic theses.2| lcgft;

655 7 a| Thèses et écrits académiques.2| rvmgf0| (CaQQLa)RVMGF-000001173;

655 2 a| Academic Dissertation.0| (DNLM)D019478?| UNAUTHORIZED;

700 1 a| Taylor, Alan,e| degree supervisor.=| ^A606064;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of Human Development and Family Science.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 u| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/9425z| Access via ScholarShip;

949 o| wjh;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 5668852;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5668852-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 9/14/2021x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5668852-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 9/14/2021x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

Couples communication assessment tools : a systematic review / by Ruitong (Cherish) Li.

Author/creator	Li, Ruitong (Cherish) author.
Other author	Taylor, Alan, degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of Human Development and Family Science.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2021.
Description	1 online resource (237 pages)
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Interpersonal communication. Couples--Psychology. Interpersonal relations.

Summary	Couple communication plays an important role in the development of intimate relationships. Selecting the right measures based on the researchers' research questions would be a crucial step for purpose of research and practice. The current study systematically evaluated twenty-one commonly utilized measures that focus on assessing couple communication, identified from current literatures stemming from the past 60 years. In addition, 380 unique empirical articles that utilized each individual measure were identified from the PsychInfo database. The theoretical foundation, the strengths and the limitations, and the level of applicability to diverse settings was evaluated for each measure based on the evidence. The best practices in terms of each measure were suggested and discussed based on the patterns found from empirical articles included in current study. Directions for future research were also provided.
General note	Presented to the faculty of the Department of Human Development and Family Science
General note	Advisor: Alan Taylor
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed September 29, 2022).
Dissertation note	M.S. East Carolina University 2021
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Genre/form	Academic theses.
Genre/form	Academic theses.
Genre/form	Thèses et écrits académiques.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Couples communication assessment tools : a systematic review / by Ruitong (Cherish) Li.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability