Tools

LEADER 02344nam a2200469 i 4500

001 ocn896881709;

003 OCoLC;

005 20191127123034.0;

006 m o d f ;

007 cr cn|||||||||;

008 141125e201409 couab obt f000 0 eng c;

035 a| (Sirsi) o896881709;

042 a| pcc;

049 a| ERE#;

074 a| 0430-P-03 (online);

086 0 a| E 9.16:NREL/TP-5400-60732;

100 1 a| Kurtz, Jennifer,e| author.=| ^A270421;

245 10 a| Backup power cost of ownership analysis and incombent technology comparison /c| J. Kurtz [and three others].;

264 1 a| Golden, CO :b| National Renewable Energy Laboratory,c| September 2014.;

300 a| 1 online resource (ix, 21 pages) :b| color illustrations, color maps.;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

490 1 a| NREL/TP ; ;v| 5400-60732;

500 a| "September 2014.";

500 a| GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references (pages 17-18).;

513 a| Technical report.;

520 3 a| This cost of ownership analysis identifies the factors impacting the value proposition for fuel cell backup power and presents the estimated annualized cost of ownership for fuel cell backup power systems compared with the incumbent technologies of battery and diesel generator systems. The analysis compares three different backup power technologies (diesel, battery, and fuel cell) operating in similar circumstances in four run time scenarios (8, 52, 72, and 176 hours).;

536 b| DE-AC36-08GO28308g| H279.1710;

588 a| Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NREL.gov website, viewed November 27, 2019).;

650 0 a| Fuel cellsx| Research.=| ^A24215;

650 0 a| Electric power systemsx| Reliabilityx| Costs.=| ^A332311;

710 2 a| National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.)e| issuing body.=| ^A367790;

830 0 a| NREL/TPv| 5400-60732.=| ^A368158;

856 40 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54939;

922 a| BIBCONEW;

949 a| Click on web addressw| asish| joyner94;

596 a| 1;

998 a| 5216906;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5216906-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE1DOu| 12/13/2019x| EDOCUMENTz| JERESOURCE;

Backup power cost of ownership analysis and incombent technology comparison / J. Kurtz [and three others].

Author/creator	Kurtz, Jennifer author.
Other author	National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.) issuing body.
Format	Electronic
Publication	Golden, CO : National Renewable Energy Laboratory, September 2014.
Description	1 online resource (ix, 21 pages) : color illustrations, color maps.
Supplemental Content	https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54939
Subjects	Fuel cells--Research. Electric power systems--Reliability. --Costs.

Series	NREL/TP ; ; 5400-60732 NREL/TP 5400-60732. ^A368158
Summary	This cost of ownership analysis identifies the factors impacting the value proposition for fuel cell backup power and presents the estimated annualized cost of ownership for fuel cell backup power systems compared with the incumbent technologies of battery and diesel generator systems. The analysis compares three different backup power technologies (diesel, battery, and fuel cell) operating in similar circumstances in four run time scenarios (8, 52, 72, and 176 hours).
General note	"September 2014."
General note	GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references (pages 17-18).
Report note	Technical report.
Funding information	DE-AC36-08GO28308 H279.1710
Source of description	Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NREL.gov website, viewed November 27, 2019).
GPO item number	0430-P-03 (online)
Govt. docs number	E 9.16:NREL/TP-5400-60732

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Backup power cost of ownership analysis and incombent technology comparison / J. Kurtz [and three others].

Click here for more information about this title

Availability