Tools

LEADER 04406cam a2200577Ii 4500

001 on1105587285;

003 OCoLC;

005 20190805020248.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr unu||||||||;

008 190624s2019 ncua obm 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o1105587285;

035 a| (OCoLC)1105587285;

049 a| EREE;

090 a| LB2838;

100 1 a| Paryani, Prerna,e| author.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 10 a| Teaching evaluation that matters :b| a participatory process for growth and development /c| by Prerna Paryani.;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2019.;

300 a| 284 pages :b| color illustrations;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text fileb| PDFc| 4.331 MB2| rda;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| Ed.D.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2019.;

500 a| Presented to the faculty of the Department of Educational Leadership;

500 a| Advisor: Matthew Militello;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed July 19, 2019).;

520 3 a| The purpose of the project was to address changes in a teacher evaluation system that has persisted as the grammar of schooling regarding evaluation for over a century (Cuban, 2013).The participatory action research (PAR) project in a South Asian international school helped a team of the principal and co-practitioners researchers (CPR=6) to implement and co-create an inquiry-based teacher evaluation process that supports teachers in improving their teaching practices and enhancing student engagement. They worked in a professional learning community that focused on peer observations, mutual feedback, and experiential learning that supported their growth as teachers. As a result, we co-designed a teacher growth and development support model for middle school teacher supervision and evaluation. Findings from three cycles of inquiry demonstrated that CPR team members and teachers' perceptions and reflections about the evaluation system altered as they viewed teacher evaluation as ongoing support, time for reflection, and continuous professional development; they reported that the current practices for classroom observations were "tailor-made" to their individual needs as teachers. The TGDS, which now serves as the formal evaluation process at the middle school, is based on collecting formative evidence on teacher goals that provides teachers with regular, consistent, and feedback. As a result, their teaching practices and level of student engagement changed over the course of three inquiry cycles. The leadership style of the principal shifted to a more distributed leadership approach (Spillane et al., 2001) based on a moral authority (Sergiovanni & Starratt, 2006). Middle school teachers who are no longer anxious during classroom observations have demonstrated a re-informed sense of their roles as teachers in building a community that includes taking actions with students, themselves, and other teachers regarding the teacher evaluation system. While school districts may have designed the instrumentation for evaluation, the principal could use the processes of the CPR group and cycles of inquiry to better differentiate support for teachers.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

650 0 a| Teachersx| Rating of.=| ^A381267;

650 0 a| Motivation in education.=| ^A7949;

650 0 a| Middle school teachers.=| ^A685105;

653 a| Grammar of Schooling;

653 a| Teacher Evaluation Process;

653 a| Student Engagement;

653 a| Professional Learning Community;

653 a| Peer Observations;

653 a| Mutual Feedback;

653 a| Experiential Learning;

700 1 a| Militello, Matthew,e| degree supervisor.=| ^A1009081;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of Educational Leadership.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Access via ScholarShipu| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/7190;

949 o| wjh;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 5111001;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5111001-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 6/24/2019x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 5111001-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 6/24/2019x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

Teaching evaluation that matters : a participatory process for growth and development / by Prerna Paryani.

Author/creator	Paryani, Prerna author.
Other author	Militello, Matthew, degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of Educational Leadership.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2019.
Description	284 pages : color illustrations
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Teachers--Rating of. Motivation in education. Middle school teachers.

Summary	The purpose of the project was to address changes in a teacher evaluation system that has persisted as the grammar of schooling regarding evaluation for over a century (Cuban, 2013).The participatory action research (PAR) project in a South Asian international school helped a team of the principal and co-practitioners researchers (CPR=6) to implement and co-create an inquiry-based teacher evaluation process that supports teachers in improving their teaching practices and enhancing student engagement. They worked in a professional learning community that focused on peer observations, mutual feedback, and experiential learning that supported their growth as teachers. As a result, we co-designed a teacher growth and development support model for middle school teacher supervision and evaluation. Findings from three cycles of inquiry demonstrated that CPR team members and teachers' perceptions and reflections about the evaluation system altered as they viewed teacher evaluation as ongoing support, time for reflection, and continuous professional development; they reported that the current practices for classroom observations were "tailor-made" to their individual needs as teachers. The TGDS, which now serves as the formal evaluation process at the middle school, is based on collecting formative evidence on teacher goals that provides teachers with regular, consistent, and feedback. As a result, their teaching practices and level of student engagement changed over the course of three inquiry cycles. The leadership style of the principal shifted to a more distributed leadership approach (Spillane et al., 2001) based on a moral authority (Sergiovanni & Starratt, 2006). Middle school teachers who are no longer anxious during classroom observations have demonstrated a re-informed sense of their roles as teachers in building a community that includes taking actions with students, themselves, and other teachers regarding the teacher evaluation system. While school districts may have designed the instrumentation for evaluation, the principal could use the processes of the CPR group and cycles of inquiry to better differentiate support for teachers.
General note	Presented to the faculty of the Department of Educational Leadership
General note	Advisor: Matthew Militello
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed July 19, 2019).
Dissertation note	Ed.D. East Carolina University 2019.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Teaching evaluation that matters : a participatory process for growth and development / by Prerna Paryani.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability