Vision Coach : effects of standing versus sitting on visual reaction times / by Megan E. Miller.

Author/creator Miller, Megan E. author.
Other author Dickerson, Anne Elizabeth degree supervisor.
Other author East Carolina University. Department of Occupational Therapy.
Format Theses and dissertations
Publication[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2017.
Description66 pages : illustrations (some color), charts.
Supplemental ContentAccess via ScholarShip
Subjects

Variant title Vision Coach effects of standing versus sitting on visual reaction times.
SeriesECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis
ECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis. UNAUTHORIZED
Summary Assessment and intervention tools for occupational therapy practice must be evidence-based for appropriate use and include normative data with healthy adults. The overall goal of this research was to collect normative data on healthy adults' visual reaction time when completing the full field 60 light task on a novel device, the Vision Coach. The specific research question in this study was to determine if a change in body positioning in regards to person's base of support will affect a person's reaction time. We hypothesized that reaction times would be significantly different in the positions of standing versus sitting. Reaction times from 121 healthy adults, ages ranging from 21-79 years, were collected. Participants completed eight trials total, four trials in a standing position, and four trials in a sitting position. There were no significant differences on the factors of body position, gender, height, and wingspan on the averaged visual reaction times. The implication is that clients can be standing or sitting for use of the tool and therapists have normative data available for usage. This research also provides foundational data for further studies on the Vision Coach apparatus as well baseline criteria for the process of standardization of the Vision Coach. Future studies will need to address the limitation of learning to determine the number of practice trials required in both positions.
General notePresented to the faculty of the Department of Occupational Therapy.
General noteAdvisor: Anne Dickerson.
General noteTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed July 7, 2017).
Dissertation noteM.S.O.T. East Carolina University 2017.
Bibliography noteIncludes bibliographical references.
Technical detailsSystem requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical detailsMode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library Location Call Number Status Item Actions
Electronic Resources Access Content Online ✔ Available