Vision Coach : effects of standing versus sitting on visual reaction times / by Megan E. Miller.
| Author/creator | Miller, Megan E. author. |
| Other author | Dickerson, Anne Elizabeth degree supervisor. |
| Other author | East Carolina University. Department of Occupational Therapy. |
| Format | Theses and dissertations |
| Publication | [Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2017. |
| Description | 66 pages : illustrations (some color), charts. |
| Supplemental Content | Access via ScholarShip |
| Subjects |
| Variant title | Vision Coach effects of standing versus sitting on visual reaction times. |
| Series | ECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis ECU College of Allied Health Sciences thesis. UNAUTHORIZED |
| Summary | Assessment and intervention tools for occupational therapy practice must be evidence-based for appropriate use and include normative data with healthy adults. The overall goal of this research was to collect normative data on healthy adults' visual reaction time when completing the full field 60 light task on a novel device, the Vision Coach. The specific research question in this study was to determine if a change in body positioning in regards to person's base of support will affect a person's reaction time. We hypothesized that reaction times would be significantly different in the positions of standing versus sitting. Reaction times from 121 healthy adults, ages ranging from 21-79 years, were collected. Participants completed eight trials total, four trials in a standing position, and four trials in a sitting position. There were no significant differences on the factors of body position, gender, height, and wingspan on the averaged visual reaction times. The implication is that clients can be standing or sitting for use of the tool and therapists have normative data available for usage. This research also provides foundational data for further studies on the Vision Coach apparatus as well baseline criteria for the process of standardization of the Vision Coach. Future studies will need to address the limitation of learning to determine the number of practice trials required in both positions. |
| General note | Presented to the faculty of the Department of Occupational Therapy. |
| General note | Advisor: Anne Dickerson. |
| General note | Title from PDF t.p. (viewed July 7, 2017). |
| Dissertation note | M.S.O.T. East Carolina University 2017. |
| Bibliography note | Includes bibliographical references. |
| Technical details | System requirements: Adobe Reader. |
| Technical details | Mode of access: World Wide Web. |
Availability
| Library | Location | Call Number | Status | Item Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Resources | Access Content Online | ✔ Available |