Tools

LEADER 03101cam a2200505Ii 4500

001 ocn910850905;

003 OCoLC;

005 20151103143357.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr bn|||||||||;

008 150608s2015 ncu ob 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o910850905;

035 a| (OCoLC)910850905;

049 a| EREE;

090 a| PR2247.C7;

100 1 a| Lake, Danielle M.,e| author.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

245 12 a| A textual edition of Donne's "The cross" and the implications of establishing a copy-text /c| by Danielle M. Lake.;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2015.;

300 a| 198 pages;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text fileb| PDFc| 0.78Mb2| rda;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| M.A.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2015.;

500 a| Presented to the faculty of the Department of English.;

500 a| Advisor: Jeffrey Johnson.;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed July 27, 2015).;

520 3 a| This thesis provides a copy-text for John Donne's poem "The Cross" based on all extant manuscript evidence. The first section is an introduction to the entire project. The second section of the thesis presents the rationale for the copy-text (an emended version of WN1), including the textual introduction, stemma, stemma notes, and textual apparatus. The third section contains a literary analysis of the poem. The textual introduction and stemma show how the 17th-century artifacts--including manuscript and printed sources--circulated and how these texts relate to one another. The third and final section provides a literary analysis of "The Cross." This portion begins with a discussion of the most signifant scribal variants found in printed editions, including the change from "call" to "all" in line 48, "Poynts" to "Pants" in line 52, and "fruitefullye" to "faithfully" in line 61. The "Literary Analysis" portion also explores two gaps in scholarship: Donne's unnoted witty syntax in the poem and an unnoticed connection between "The Cross" and Donne's 1622 Hanworth Sermon.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

600 10 a| Donne, John,d| 1572-1631x| Criticism, Textual.=| ^A635071;

600 10 a| Donne, John,d| 1572-1631t| Crossx| Criticism, Textual.=| ^A635071;

650 0 a| Discourse analysis, Literary.=| ^A133141;

653 a| British and Irish literature;

700 1 a| Johnson, Jeffrey,d| 1957-e| degree supervisor.=| ^A416775;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of English.=| ^A641948;

856 40 z| Access via ScholarShipu| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4905;

949 o| jgml;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 3766698;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 3766698-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 6/9/2015x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 3766698-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 6/9/2015x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

A textual edition of Donne's "The cross" and the implications of establishing a copy-text / by Danielle M. Lake.

Author/creator	Lake, Danielle M. author.
Other author	Johnson, Jeffrey, 1957- degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of English.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2015.
Description	198 pages
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Donne, John, 1572-1631--Criticism, Textual. Donne, John, 1572-1631 Cross--Criticism, Textual. Discourse analysis, Literary.

Summary	This thesis provides a copy-text for John Donne's poem "The Cross" based on all extant manuscript evidence. The first section is an introduction to the entire project. The second section of the thesis presents the rationale for the copy-text (an emended version of WN1), including the textual introduction, stemma, stemma notes, and textual apparatus. The third section contains a literary analysis of the poem. The textual introduction and stemma show how the 17th-century artifacts--including manuscript and printed sources--circulated and how these texts relate to one another. The third and final section provides a literary analysis of "The Cross." This portion begins with a discussion of the most signifant scribal variants found in printed editions, including the change from "call" to "all" in line 48, "Poynts" to "Pants" in line 52, and "fruitefullye" to "faithfully" in line 61. The "Literary Analysis" portion also explores two gaps in scholarship: Donne's unnoted witty syntax in the poem and an unnoticed connection between "The Cross" and Donne's 1622 Hanworth Sermon.
General note	Presented to the faculty of the Department of English.
General note	Advisor: Jeffrey Johnson.
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed July 27, 2015).
Dissertation note	M.A. East Carolina University 2015.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

A textual edition of Donne's "The cross" and the implications of establishing a copy-text / by Danielle M. Lake.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability