Tools

LEADER 03040cam a2200493Ii 4500

001 ocn869832974;

003 OCoLC;

005 20140310011119.0;

006 m o d ;

007 cr bn|||||||||;

008 140204s2013 ncua ob 000 0 eng d;

035 a| (Sirsi) o869832974;

035 a| (OCoLC)869832974;

049 a| EREE;

090 a| BF485;

100 1 a| Parker, Zachary,e| author.=| ^A1176027;

245 14 a| The differential framing measure for procrastination :b| an implicit measure of procrastination cognitions /c| by Zachary Parker.;

264 1 a| [Greenville, N.C.] :b| [East Carolina University],c| 2013.;

300 a| 69 pages :b| illustrations (some color);

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

347 a| text fileb| PDFc| 1.38Mb2| rda;

538 a| System requirements: Adobe Reader.;

538 a| Mode of access: World Wide Web.;

502 b| M.A.c| East Carolina Universityd| 2013.;

500 a| Presented to the faculty of the Department of Psychology.;

500 a| Advisor: Mark C. Bowler.;

500 a| Title from PDF t.p. (viewed , 2014).;

520 3 a| The present study attempted to create a scale for measuring the implicit cognitions related to procrastination. Items for the measure were created from a set of cognitive rationalizations derived from existing procrastination research. Unfortunately, the items for the new measure failed to converge on to a single factor, thus inhibiting further analysis. Nevertheless, data analysis using established measures of procrastination produced a growth curve model that demonstrated the difference between non-procrastinators and procrastinators. The behavioral indicators of procrastination were based on participants' accumulation of participation credits, the order in which participants registered for their account, and the time taken by participants to activate their account. Significant correlations were found between several established self-report procrastination measures and the criterion measures of procrastination. Thus, this study's findings are limited to the procrastination and criterion measures used. Nonetheless, the utility of the criterion measure as an indicator of procrastination was demonstrated.;

504 a| Includes bibliographical references.;

650 0 a| Procrastination.=| ^A240739;

650 0 a| Personality and cognition.=| ^A257086;

653 a| Psychology;

700 1 a| Bowler, Mark C.,e| degree supervisor.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

710 2 a| East Carolina University.b| Department of Psychology.?| UNAUTHORIZED;

856 40 z| Access via ScholarShipu| http://hdl.handle.net/10342/4339;

949 o| jgml;

994 a| C0b| ERE;

596 a| 1 4;

998 a| 3422631;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 3422631-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE3ETDu| 2/4/2014x| ETDz| JERESOURCE;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 3422631-2001l| HSLELECm| HSLr| Ys| Yt| HEETDu| 2/4/2014x| ETDz| HERESOURCE;

The differential framing measure for procrastination : an implicit measure of procrastination cognitions / by Zachary Parker.

Author/creator	Parker, Zachary author.
Other author	Bowler, Mark C., degree supervisor.
Other author	East Carolina University. Department of Psychology.
Format	Theses and dissertations
Publication	[Greenville, N.C.] : [East Carolina University], 2013.
Description	69 pages : illustrations (some color)
Supplemental Content	Access via ScholarShip
Subjects	Procrastination. Personality and cognition.

Summary	The present study attempted to create a scale for measuring the implicit cognitions related to procrastination. Items for the measure were created from a set of cognitive rationalizations derived from existing procrastination research. Unfortunately, the items for the new measure failed to converge on to a single factor, thus inhibiting further analysis. Nevertheless, data analysis using established measures of procrastination produced a growth curve model that demonstrated the difference between non-procrastinators and procrastinators. The behavioral indicators of procrastination were based on participants' accumulation of participation credits, the order in which participants registered for their account, and the time taken by participants to activate their account. Significant correlations were found between several established self-report procrastination measures and the criterion measures of procrastination. Thus, this study's findings are limited to the procrastination and criterion measures used. Nonetheless, the utility of the criterion measure as an indicator of procrastination was demonstrated.
General note	Presented to the faculty of the Department of Psychology.
General note	Advisor: Mark C. Bowler.
General note	Title from PDF t.p. (viewed , 2014).
Dissertation note	M.A. East Carolina University 2013.
Bibliography note	Includes bibliographical references.
Technical details	System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Technical details	Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

The differential framing measure for procrastination : an implicit measure of procrastination cognitions / by Zachary Parker.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability