Tools

LEADER 03341cam a2200481 4500

001 T15026;

003 CU-RivES;

005 20141212021904.0;

006 m | d | ;

007 cr |n||||||||n;

008 781208s1792 enk|||| o o00| ||eng c;

035 a| (Sirsi) a3024247;

035 a| (Uk-ES)006215098;

035 a| (OCoLC)508483819;

049 a| EREE;

110 1 a| Great Britain.b| High Court of Appeals for Prizes.=| ^A756324;

240 10 a| Chinsurah and its dependencies=| ^A756324;

245 10 a| Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty. On appeal of Thomas Morton Esquire. The said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellant. Against Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies, the officers and crews of His Majesty's sloop Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and essects, taken and seized at Chinsurah, and James Heseltine Esq. procurator-general of Our Sovereign Lord the King, - respondents. Appeal of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of said sloop Nymph, and the said James Heseltine Esq. - - appellants. Against the said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the said East India Company, - - - respondent. Case on behalf Thomas Morton, Esq.;

260 a| [London] :b| [publisher not identified],c| [1792];

300 a| 9 pages, 1 unnumbered page ;c| 2⁰.;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

500 a| Date from docket title.;

500 a| Brace(s) in title or imprint.;

509 a| NACO HTC.;

510 4 a| English Short Title Catalog,c| T15026.;

500 a| Reproduction of original from British Library.;

610 20 a| East India Companyv| Early works to 1800.=| ^A25235;

650 0 a| Seizure of vessels and cargoesv| Early works to 1800.=| ^A381988;

650 0 a| Capture at seav| Early works to 1800.=| ^A335407;

752 a| Great Britainb| Englandd| London.;

852 a| bLb| British Librarye| London, Englandj| L.20.e.1[Vol. 18](71)x| Pr| 1162800;

856 40 u| http://find.galegroup.com/ecco/infomark.do?contentSet=ECCOArticles&docType=ECCOArticles&bookId=1355003700&type=getFullCitation&tabID=T001&prodId=ECCO&docLevel=TEXT_GRAPHICS&version=1.0&source=library&userGroupName=ncliveecuz| Full text online;

949 a| Click on web addressw| asish| joyner216o| jjlm;

998 a| 3024247;

998 a| u3024247;

596 a| 1;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| 3024247-1001l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNEECO2EBKu| 5/17/2012x| EBOOKz| JERESOURCEo| .STAFF. jjlm;

APA Citation

Great Britain (1792). Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty. On appeal of Thomas Morton Esquire. The said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellant. Against Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies, the officers and crews of His Majesty's sloop Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and essects, taken and seized at Chinsurah, and James Heseltine Esq. procurator-general of Our Sovereign Lord the King, - respondents. Appeal of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of said sloop Nymph, and the said James Heseltine Esq. - - appellants. Against the said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the said East India Company, - - - respondent. Case on behalf Thomas Morton, Esq. publisher not identified

MLA Citation

Great Britain Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty. On appeal of Thomas Morton Esquire. The said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellant. Against Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies, the officers and crews of His Majesty's sloop Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and essects, taken and seized at Chinsurah, and James Heseltine Esq. procurator-general of Our Sovereign Lord the King, - respondents. Appeal of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of said sloop Nymph, and the said James Heseltine Esq. - - appellants. Against the said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the said East India Company, - - - respondent. Case on behalf Thomas Morton, Esq. publisher not identified, 1792.

Chicago Citation

Before the Most Noble and Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of Appeals in Prize Causes. Chinsurah and its dependencies. An appeal from the High Court of Admiralty. On appeal of Thomas Morton Esquire. The said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies, - - - - appellant. Against Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, Knight of the Bath, late commander in chief of a squadron of His Majesty's ships and vessels in the East Indies, the officers and crews of His Majesty's sloop Nymph, one of the said squadron, pretended captors of all and singular the treasure, goods, wares, merchandizes, and essects, taken and seized at Chinsurah, and James Heseltine Esq. procurator-general of Our Sovereign Lord the King, - respondents. Appeal of Sir Edward Hughes. The said Vice Admiral Sir Edward Hughes, and the officers and crew of said sloop Nymph, and the said James Heseltine Esq. - - appellants. Against the said Thomas Morton Esq. syndic of the said East India Company, - - - respondent. Case on behalf Thomas Morton, Esq.

Author/creator	Great Britain
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	[London] : [publisher not identified], [1792]
Description	9 pages, 1 unnumbered page ; 2⁰.
Supplemental Content	Full text online
Subjects	Morton, T. (Thomas), appellant--Trials, litigation, etc. --Early works to 1800. Hughes, Edward, respondent--Trials, litigation, etc. --Early works to 1800. East India Company--Early works to 1800. Seizure of vessels and cargoes--Early works to 1800. Capture at sea--Early works to 1800.

Uniform title	Chinsurah and its dependencies
General note	Date from docket title.
General note	Brace(s) in title or imprint.
General note	Reproduction of original from British Library.
References	English Short Title Catalog, T15026.
Reproduction note	Electronic reproduction. Farmington Hills, Mich. : Cengage Gale, 2009. Available via the World Wide Web. Access limited by licensing agreements.

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

Click here for more information about this title

Availability