Tools

LEADER 03229cam a2200433Ia 4500

001 ocn243491699;

003 OCoLC;

005 20080912145449.0;

006 m d f ;

007 cr a||||||||||;

008 080811s2008 mdua ss f000 0 eng d;

040 a| VVKc| VVKd| GPOd| MvI;

049 a| ERE#;

074 a| 0491-B-41 (online);

086 0 a| HE 20.6517/10:213;

100 1 a| Taylor, Amy K.=| ^A788332;

245 10 a| State differences in offer rates and enrollment in employer-sponsored health insurance plans that required no employee contribution to the premium cost, 2005 /c| Amy K. Taylor and Beth Levin Crimmel.;

260 a| [Rockville, Md.] :b| Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,c| [2008];

300 a| 6 p. :b| digital, PDF file;

336 a| textb| txt2| rdacontent;

337 a| computerb| c2| rdamedia;

338 a| online resourceb| cr2| rdacarrier;

490 1 a| Statistical brief ;v| #213;

538 a| Mode of access: Internet from the MEPS AHRQ web site. Address as of 9/12/2008: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data%5Ffiles/publications/st213/stat213.pdf; current access available via PURL.;

500 a| Title from title screen (viewed Sept. 12, 2008).;

500 a| "July 2008.";

500 a| GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).;

520 a| While many employers have cut back their health insurance benefits in response to rising costs, some employers continue to pay 100 percent of premiums for their employees. In 2005, almost one-quarter of employees in establishments with health insurance worked in firms that offered at least one plan where the employer required no employee contribution to the health insurance premium for at least one plan with single coverage. This Statistical Brief presents estimates of offer rates and enrollment in employer-sponsored health insurance plans requiring no employee contribution in the ten most populous states in 2005. The availability of such plans varies considerably by state and firm size, among other factors. State variations from the national average are discussed. The estimates shown in this brief, which are drawn from the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-IC), look at both single and family coverage in the private sector of the economy. In addition to all firms, estimates for employees working for small (less than 50 employees) and large (50 or more employees) firms are shown. All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.;

650 0 a| Employer-sponsored health insurancez| United States.=| ^A455910;

650 0 a| Health insurance.=| ^A879;

700 1 a| Crimmel, Beth Levin.=| ^A788309;

710 1 a| United States.b| Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.=| ^A457038;

710 2 a| Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (U.S.)=| ^A420615;

830 0 a| Statistical brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (U.S.)) ;v| #213.=| ^A788249;

856 40 u| https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS102098;

949 a| Click on web addressw| asish| joyner94;

596 a| 1;

998 a| 1432550;

999 a| CLICK ON WEB ADDRESSw| ASISc| 1i| MQ2709758l| JNETm| JOYNERr| Ys| Yt| JNE1DOu| 10/28/2008x| EDOCUMENTz| JERESOURCEo| .STAFF. 0;

State differences in offer rates and enrollment in employer-sponsored health insurance plans that required no employee contribution to the premium cost, 2005 / Amy K. Taylor and Beth Levin Crimmel.

Author/creator	Taylor, Amy K.
Other author	Crimmel, Beth Levin.
Other author	United States. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Other author	Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (U.S.)
Format	Electronic
Publication Info	[Rockville, Md.] : Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, [2008]
Description	6 p. : digital, PDF file
Supplemental Content	https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS102098
Subjects	Employer-sponsored health insurance--United States. Health insurance.

Series	Statistical brief ; #213 Statistical brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (U.S.)) ; #213. ^A788249
Abstract	While many employers have cut back their health insurance benefits in response to rising costs, some employers continue to pay 100 percent of premiums for their employees. In 2005, almost one-quarter of employees in establishments with health insurance worked in firms that offered at least one plan where the employer required no employee contribution to the health insurance premium for at least one plan with single coverage. This Statistical Brief presents estimates of offer rates and enrollment in employer-sponsored health insurance plans requiring no employee contribution in the ten most populous states in 2005. The availability of such plans varies considerably by state and firm size, among other factors. State variations from the national average are discussed. The estimates shown in this brief, which are drawn from the Insurance Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-IC), look at both single and family coverage in the private sector of the economy. In addition to all firms, estimates for employees working for small (less than 50 employees) and large (50 or more employees) firms are shown. All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
General note	Title from title screen (viewed Sept. 12, 2008).
General note	"July 2008."
General note	GPO Cataloging Record Distribution Program (CRDP).
Technical details	Mode of access: Internet from the MEPS AHRQ web site. Address as of 9/12/2008: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data%5Ffiles/publications/st213/stat213.pdf; current access available via PURL.
GPO item number	0491-B-41 (online)
Govt. docs number	HE 20.6517/10:213

Availability

Library	Location	Call Number	Status	Item Actions
	Electronic Resources	Access Content Online	✔ Available

State differences in offer rates and enrollment in employer-sponsored health insurance plans that required no employee contribution to the premium cost, 2005 / Amy K. Taylor and Beth Levin Crimmel.

Click here for more information about this title

Availability